Qaf · model evaluation · 4 November 2026

No free OpenRouter model can serve tier 3

The free tier allows under 1.5% of tier 3 traffic. The closest model on quality, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, is less accurate than Gemma and may train on user prompts.

My recommendation is not to use the free tier for tier 3, even as overflow. If we want a cheaper tier 3 model, paid Gemma 4 31B is still the one to beat, at about $0.0025 per answer in this bench.

It can't handle the load

about 480 of 36,000

answers a day. At peak traffic, the daily quota would last about 11 minutes.

LimitFree tierTier 3 needs
Requests per day1,000about 75,000
Requests per minute20about 90 at peak

The closest model is less accurate than Gemma

Each model answered the same 30 questions using real retrieval at tier 3 settings. A Claude judge compared each answer blind against Gemma and graded it against the passages it cited. Gemma used its own tuned prompt.

ModelPreferred over GemmaCorrectness (of 5)Major or critical issuesFabricated or misattributed textCites invented IDsMedian answer
Gemma 4 31B (paid)–4.1790140 s
Super VL, free13–173.53172043 s
Super VL, stricter prompt*13–173.63180033 s
Nemotron 3 Ultra, free12–183.20232241 s
North Mini, free2–272.672871350 s

*Run on paid Super VL hosts because the free quota had run out. The first prompt scored the same correctness (3.53) on the free and paid hosts, so the host doesn't explain the differences. The paid runs cost $0.005–0.006 per answer, two to two and a half times Gemma.

Prompt changes fixed format, not accuracy

Privacy rules out the best performers

All four Nemotron models and LFM only route if we allow providers that may train on prompts. Serving them would send real user questions, often personal religious ones, to those providers. Our eval rules forbid this for production data, so I tested with questions I wrote, and no user text was sent. The system prompt did reach those providers.

The working models that pass OpenRouter's no-training filter are North Mini, Dots, Flint and Xing, and all four were much weaker than Gemma.

Every free model

The peak test ran about 105 requests a minute for 30 seconds per model and stopped early after 15 straight failures. Preference and correctness come from the 8-question screen unless marked, so those numbers are rough. Screen models ran on Gemma's prompt without the tuning or required search that the 30-question finalists and Gemma had.

ModelPeak test successPreferred over GemmaCorrectnessMedian answerNo-training filterResult
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL50/5213–17 (30 Q)3.5343 sNoClosest, but less accurate
Nemotron 3 Ultra43/5212–18 (30 Q)3.2041 sNoMore unsupported claims
North Mini44/522–27 (30 Q)2.6750 sYesInvents citation IDs
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning52/521–72.7517 sNoFast; broken citations, Chinese in answers
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni45/520–83.1293 sNoToo slow
Flint46/522–63.25166 sYesFar too slow
Dots 3 Note41/522–62.6228 sYesMixes languages, rarely cites
LFM 2.513/520–62.5013 sNoNo valid citations; limited upstream
Xing 4.03/250–72.0039 sYesLimited upstream, poor quality
Gemma 4 31B (free)0/15–––YesLimited upstream; no answers
Gemma 4 26B (free)0/15–––YesLimited upstream; no answers
Crouton Alpha0/15–––UnclearEvery request returned 502
openrouter/free44/52––––Picks a random model each request, so not benchmarked
Inkling, Inkling Small–––––403: agentic harnesses only; free period ends today
Lyria 3 (2), Content Safety–––––No tool support, so can't run our chat

What this doesn't show